It only disqualifies individuals convicted of corruption.

It disqualifies individuals convicted under laws related to heinous crimes, irrespective of sentence duration, for six years after release.

It allows convicted individuals to contest elections after one year.

It disqualifies convicted individuals only in the case of terrorist activities.

It upheld the disqualification of convicted persons for a period of six years.

It declared Section 8(4) of the RP Act unconstitutional, which previously allowed convicted legislators to continue holding office.

It allowed convicted individuals to contest elections immediately after their conviction.

It upheld the power of the Election Commission to reduce the disqualification period for convicted individuals

Banning politicians with minor criminal charges.

Allowing convicted persons to contest elections after serving their sentence.

Barring individuals convicted of serious crimes (punishable by over five years imprisonment) from contesting elections.

Reducing the disqualification period for convicted politicians.

The RP Act focuses only on convicted MPs, while Article 102 is about disqualification for a range of reasons, including mental incapacity and citizenship.

The RP Act does not mention disqualification based on citizenship, while Article 102 does.

Article 102 disqualifies MPs only for crimes involving moral turpitude.

The RP Act applies only to MPs, while Article 102 applies to all elected representatives in India